Skip to content
narrow screen wide screen auto screen Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

CoachesInfo.com - information and education for coaches

Secure login          
Home - Articles - General Articles - Otago University Study Warns That Body Padding May Not Prevent Serious Rugby Injuries
Otago University Study Warns That Body Padding May Not Prevent Serious Rugby Injuries PDF Print

Body protection clothing may not protect rugby players from serious injuries, according to a new Otago University study supported by the NZRFU, ACC and Sports Science New Zealand.

The study also makes a strong call against the use of protective clothing as either an "offensive weapon" in tackles or to engender a feeling of "invulnerability" in players that may expose them to a higher risk of serious injury.

Padded clothing is commonly worn by rugby players from international right down to club and schoolboy level, mainly to protect the shoulder region in tackle situations. The study found that:

  • Padded clothing helped protect players from cuts and bruises but could not protect them from serious shoulder injuries, such as fractures, dislocations and ligament damage.
  • Padded clothing reduced the impact by less than 5%. This compared to shin pads used in soccer, which reduced impact by up to 75%.
  • Stiffer material was not an option for padded clothing because this would be unsuitable for rugby, reducing mobility to an unacceptable degree and possibly further adding to the problem.

The main researchers in the study were Professor Peter Milburn (School of Physiotherapy), Dr Barry Wilson (School of Physical Education) and Dr David Chalmers (Injury Prevention Research Unit).

"The aim of the study was to provide definitive information on the ability of commonly used protective clothing to absorb the impact of forces involved in tackling," Professor Milburn says.

"The study was prompted by concerns expressed in the media by schoolboy rugby administrators that, since the introduction of professionalism, rugby has become more gladiatorial and more a physical confrontation than a test of skills.

"The perception is that kids are going into games thinking that because they have padding on, they're less likely to be injured, so they go into tackles harder and more aggressively." Professor Milburn says there is evidence that the frequency of injury, up to and including international level, is increasing because players wearing padding think they are "bullet-proof".

He quotes recent research by a leading British expert, Professor Michael Garraway, who said the factor most contributing to "the increased burden of injuries in competitive play is the almost universal adoption of protective equipment in rugby."

Professor Garraway suspected the use of protective clothing was making players more, rather than less, vulnerable and that the equipment may be giving them a psychological edge when "using their increased physical presence to tackle opponents". He added that amateur players were increasingly following professional players' example.

"The big concern is that players are tackling differently than they used to, particularly in the use of smother tackles that are designed to prevent opponents releasing the ball," Professor Milburn says.

"Our research into tackling shows that many injuries are occurring in smother tackles and upper body tackles that are really collisions. Players can generate forces of between one third and a quarter of a tonne in these tackle situations. So if players are going into tackles feeling that they are 'invulnerable' because they're wearing padded clothing, they may adopt unsafe techniques and suffer more serious injuries."

The study recommends:

  • Padded tops be recognised as providing protection against cuts and bruises only.
  • Referees discourage the use of illegal or dangerous tackles by players.
  • Coaches, players and administrators commit themselves to the use of safe skills, particularly in tackling and being tackled.
  • Manufacturers clearly state that their products are padding, not protection, and will not prevent serious injury.

The Otago University research looked at a range of IRB-approved products available through sporting goods outlets. Tests were conducted that simulated impact force in tackling, using a padded weight dropped onto a fibreglass-reinforced mannequin wearing the product. The mannequin was mounted on a force plate which measured the size and duration of the impact force.

Results from the research project have been sent to the NZRFU, Sports Science New Zealand and NZ Accident Rehabilitation and Insurance (ACC), who funded the study.

For further information, contact:

Professor Peter Milburn
School of Physiotherapy
University of Otago
Tel 03 479 7455
Email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .