Introduction
Gymnastics
has moved over the last 25 years into an era characterised by ahtleticism,
agility and small body size. Through the 1970's with Olga Korbet and Nadia
Comanichi and into the 80's with Oksana Omilianchik and Mary-Lou Retton,
contemporary gymnastics certainly witnessed the 'child champion'. Small
and strong; the body shape these athletes had led them to bring the complexity
of women's gymnastics to a level never witnessed before.
Recently,
for application in the current Olympic Cycle, the Federation of International
Gymnastics raised the minimum age of senior women gymnasts from 15 to
16 years. This change acknowledged that young girls with small bodies
often achieved higher levels of performance early in their careers and
was an attempt to reward girls who stay in the sport to physical maturity.
Contrary
to this, during the last decade we have witnessed some taller, more linear,
gymnasts such as Svetlana Boginskia and current World Champion Svetlana
Chorkina; both substantially taller women have been able to work the Code
of Points to their advantage. But now moving into the new millennium,
all available information indicates that the next 'Code of Points' will
possess an acrobatic bias. This bias will encourage those athletes with
the acrobatic athletic structure currently being characterised by American
- Vanessa Atler; an athlete who is compact in body size, explosive and
dynamic in performance and displays complex acrobatics. A new open ended
judging criteria, similar to that used in diving, will be implemented
and more difficult and complex routines will be rewarded with higher scores.
Taking
this into consideration, smaller gymnasts with a high strength to weight
ratio are better able to handle their own weight during complex skills,
particularly those involving rotation around one or more axis of the body.
Biomechanical principles underlie this trend in both physique and style.
Selection of the appropriate body type prior to training is critical to
be successful in elite gymnastics in this day and age.
Selection
of Athletes
Of
all female sports, gymnastics has one of the most obvious trade-mark body
images. Research suggests that female gymnastics is more dependent on
genotype, with participants already possessing the basic physique of small
stature, short limbs, broad shoulders, and narrow hips. If body type is
so critical to successful performance in gymnastics, it seems logical
to encourage girls with inappropriate morphology into alternative sports
in which they can have success. Lack of success and lack of skill improvement
can be factors leading to attrition of children from sport. This will
limit attrition by female participants from sport as they experience enjoyment
from and commitment to a suitable activity.
Successful
performance depends upon the delicate interplay between the inertial properties
of the body segments and the external and internal forces which act on
those body segments (Jensen, 1978). Segmental inertias represent direct
constraints on the efforts of the sportsperson to develop linear and angular
momentum. Consequently, those with large segmental inertias require large
forces in order to maintain movement patterns similar to a sportsperson
with smaller segmental inertias. Hence the tendency is for people with
low segmental inertias to be successful in sports requiring rapid rotational
sequences, such as gymnastics.
Body
Growth
When
the overall body size of an individual changes due to growth, it is the
interplay between the changes in each individual body segment which affects
the ability of the athlete to perform. Jensen (1981) reported that as
the moments of inertia of the individual segments of the human body increased
due to growth, there was an increased compensation in the force patterns
in order to maintain or improve the performance of rotational movements.
There is also evidence to suggest that, as a girl passes through puberty,
there is a substantial decrease in performance of rotational movements
due to large increases in the body segment moments of inertia (Jensen,
1981). These changes in inertia represent constraints to which the body
must adapt if the level of motor performance is to be maintained or improved.
Training
In
order to achieve an internationally competitive level of gymnastics performance
an extraordinary amount of training is required. The effect that this
training has on the delicate balance of the developing body is difficult
to measure. Girls who are initially identified as having the necessary
potential to be included in a intensive gymnastic training centre often
already possess a smaller, stronger and leaner morphology than the average.
It appears that body lengths are strongly influenced by heredity, while
body widths and girths can be more influenced by training (Malina, 1978;
Salmela, 1979).
Self
selection for gymnastics and training may result in a decreased intensity
of growth, delayed onset of the symptoms of sexual maturation and altered
rhythm of the consecutive stages of development (Ziemilska, 1985). The
often found delay in menarche has been attributed to: net caloric deficit
with exercise over time, low weight to height ratio, critical body weight,
and the composition and altered hormonal levels.
The
inverse relationships between skill level and physical characteristics
such as adipose tissue, weight and body size, along with the direct relationship
between high power to weight ratios and extremely high skill levels, indicate
the need for regular intensive training. In general, the body responds
in a normal manner when the level of training is reduced. Hence it appears
important that girls need to possess the small body prior to beginning
training and grow slowly.
An
(unpublished) study recently completed by Richards, Elliott, and Ackland,
assists in the understanding of the relationship between morphology and
intensity of growth experienced by subjects who participated in training
for gymnastics. Thirty seven females, aged initially between 10 and 12
years of age, completed a mixed longitudinal study conducted over 3.3
years. Testing sessions at four-monthly intervals comprised measures of
structural growth including height, mass, skinfolds and segment lengths
and determination of the inertial parameters of the leg, thigh and trunk
segments using the elliptical zone modelling technique. Tests of functional
development comprised the assessment of gymnastics performance (front
and back saltos, a twisting vertical jump and a v-sit action), a vertical
jump, as well as lower limb, upper limb and trunk strength assessments.
The sample was divided into two training groups to distinguish between
elite and moderately trained gymnasts.
The
results indicated that the sample was smaller in body size than the general
population. Furthermore, the elite gymnasts were smaller than the moderately
trained gymnasts and other results were similarly consistent across the
gymnastics performance tests. High levels of angular momentum did not
enhance the resultant performance. Performance of the back salto was not
so dependent upon leg strength as were the front salto and the twisting
jump; the former relying more on technique than strength for a good performance.
The power to mass ratio was a very strong predictor of jump height on
the vertical jump test, though this test related little to gymnastics
performance. Vertical jump height was shown to be a poor predictor for
successful gymnastics performance.
Subjects
of smaller height and slimmer build performed better on the gymnastics
activities. Those girls who grew substantially during the course of the
study were less likely to perform well on the gymnastics activities. The
subjects who grew a lot during the study and had an absolute larger body
size were also those who displayed high levels of leg power and strength,
though this did not enhance their performance. Those athletes who had
a high strength to mass ratio were better able to take-off in a closer
to vertical position to perform the saltos more successfully, particularly
the back salto. The trunk strength for mass ratio appeared to be the strength
measure that was most affected, in a negative direction, by large changes
in body size.
The
level of training undertaken by the subjects during the course of the
study significantly affected their ability to perform the gymnastics activities
successfully. The highly trained gymnasts were able to produce higher
levels of trunk velocity on both the front and back saltos, higher amounts
of longitudinal rotation on the twisting jump and produce a faster v-sit
action.
The
performance of both training groups improved with increasing age and this
improvement affected the highly trained and moderately trained gymnasts
in a similar pattern. The amount of angular momentum able to be produced
on take-off significantly increased with the age of the gymnast. This
was caused by a parallel increase in whole body moment of inertia. High
levels of angular momentum had a detrimental effect on the success of
the front salto. Higher levels of leg power were produced by the moderately
trained gymnasts and this variable also increased with age. This finding
was contrary to the results for the trunk and upper limb strength measures
as well as strength to mass ratios, which displayed increases for both
training intensity and with age. The only exception was leg strength,
which was found to be similar between the moderate and elite trained gymnasts.
In
order to facilitate greater understanding of the relationships between
structural growth and functional development, actual growth and performance
histories were examined for four case histories. Case one, an elite gymnast,
experienced a low level of growth thus maintaining a small body size,
which, combined with her level of training, improved gymnastic performance.
Although case two was particularly strong, her high level of growth, particularly
in body mass and moment of inertia, did not enable her to maintain her
performance. This, coupled with reducing her training during the course
of the study resulted in a deterioration in performance. A low growth
rate and small actual body size enabled case three to achieve a high level
of skill although she only performed a moderate amount of gymnastics training.
Case four had a large actual body size and grew quickly, which combined
with a moderate level of training, resulted in a reduced level of gymnastics
performance, although she maximised her technique and performed at a level
above what would have been predicted for her morphology.
A
number of conclusions and recommendations regarding talent
selection and subsequent training in elite gymnastics can
be drawn from this study.
- At
12.5 years of age, smaller, slimmer gymnasts performed better
on the gymnastics skills. This must have ramifications to
talent identification programs and selection of athletes specifically
for gymnastics. Girls who are naturally small in structure
and slim have a greater chance of being a good performer.
- Although
bigger gymnasts also had stronger legs, this did not help
them to outperform the smaller more agile gymnasts. Hence
it may be that a small structure is a better predictor to
good performance than being strong.
- Gymnasts
who had a high strength to weight ratio also produced high
levels of performance. Therefore, strength is only a relevant
predictor of good performance if it is considered closely
with body mass. This was particularly obvious in skills where
there was less technique involved. The results indicate that
as the skill became more technical (ie the back saulto) girls
with good technique could outperform those with a high strength
: weight ratio.
- Girls
who grew significantly in height over the three years of the
study had poorer performances. Hence it could be assumed if
growth can be slow and steady without large accelerations,
which are normal with adolescence, a young gymnast has a better
chance of maintaining improvements in performance.
- Great
increases in mass over the period of the study were particularly
detrimental to performances involving the twisting action.
When a gymnast twists she needs her body to be as narrow as
possible to permit speedy rotation. Large gains in body mass
hinder this action.
- Development
of leg power seem to be unaffected by growth of these subjects
over the course of this study. So, it may be that adolescent
growth in girls may not hinder progression in other sports
such as athletics, but in technical sports where rotation
of the body is concerned any increase in body size may effect
performance.
- Athletes
who trained at a high volume (ie., over 20 hours per week)
performed better in the gymnastics tests. Hence, for improvements
in gymnastics, many hours of training are required.
Summary
In
summary, from these results, for optimal performance in gymnastics the following factors are important:
- a
small body
- small
steady increases in growth
- high
strength : weight ratio
- training
greater than 20 hours per week
|